Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Halsey-Ricks v. US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 1:2023cv00481
Plaintiff:
Dina Halsey-Ricks
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and US Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Halsey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00629
Plaintiff:
Phillip Halsey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
NICHOLS v. BERRYHILL et al
as 1:2018cv00113
Plaintiff:
TAMMY LYNN WEBBER NICHOLS
Defendant:
NANCY A BERRYHILL, HALSEY B FRANK and JEFF B SESSIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Halsey v. Berryhill
as 4:2017cv01044
Plaintiff:
Lisa Renee Halsey
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
HALSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2015cv06311
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HALSEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Halsey v. Colvin
as 4:2014cv00394
Defendant:
Carilyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Halsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Halsey v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01680
Plaintiff:
Gloria Halsey
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HALSEY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2013cv00900
Plaintiff:
BONITA HALSEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Halsey v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00037
Defendant:
Michael Astrue
Plaintiff:
Tamara Kathryn Halsey
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Halsey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2010cv01139
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A. Halsey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
