Cases 21 - 30 of 182
Bibb County, Alabama et al v. McKinsey and Company Inc
as 7:2022cv01601
Plaintiff:
Bibb County, Alabama, Cherokee County, Alabama, City of Cullman, Alabama and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv01379
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton Insurance DAC v. Pfeifer Sutter Family LLC
as 1:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Insurance DAC
Defendant:
Pfeifer Sutter Family LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc., John Stelter, J.S. Held, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 5:2022cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Hon. Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharifi v. Hamm et al
as 1:2022cv00264
Plaintiff:
Mohammad Sharifi
Defendant:
John Hamm, Steve Marshall, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00765
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kirby v. Sysco Company et al
as 5:2021cv01723
Plaintiff:
Gerry Kirby
Defendant:
Sysco Company and James Hamilton Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Bateman v. Cone et al
as 2:2021cv01285
Plaintiff:
Nathan Parke Bateman
Defendant:
Matt Cone, Wayne Knight, Samuel Ebeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00504
Plaintiff:
Arthur Hamilton
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kim Thomas, Gwendolyn Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
