Cases 21 - 30 of 670
Bailey v. BJ Hammon Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv04635
Plaintiff:
William Lee Bailey
Defendant:
BJ Hammon Enterprise, Inc. and Marcus P Corner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Taylor v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scot Taylor
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Hammons
as 23-6190
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BRITT JARRIEL HAMMONS
Taylor v. Payne et al
as 9:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scot Taylor
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00412
Plaintiff:
David Allen Jones
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv01033
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Britt Jarriel Hammons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Adams et al v. Payne et al
as 1:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Joe Daniel Adams, Christopher Scot Taylor, David Allen Jones and others
Defendant:
James Payne, Karren Price, LeAnn Rafferty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammons v. Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv00304
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Lyn Hammons
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mabery v. Hammon
as 5:2023cv00935
Plaintiff:
Radford Mabery
Defendant:
SGT FNU Hammon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
