Cases 11 - 20 of 75
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Mason et al
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Charlie Health Mason, Toni Scott Mason, Charlie Heath Mason and others
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Dorsey & Dorsey Engineering, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00226
Defendant:
Larry Charles Dorsey, Dorsey & Dorsey Engineering, Inc. and Pamela D. Dorsey
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Dumas Realty, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00187
Defendant:
William E. Dumas, Jr. and Dumas Realty, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Murphy-Thomas et al
as 2:2019mc03856
Garnishee:
John Hancock Retirement Plan Services, LLC
Defendant:
Christi Murphy-Thomas
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Hancock v. Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 1:2019cv00017
Defendant:
Cincinnati Insurance Company and Shanavia Janine Westbrook
Plaintiff:
Alexis Victoria Hancock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hancock Whitney Bank v. Coumanis Allen, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Michael N. Coumanis, Austin Smith Allen and Coumanis Allen, LLC
Plaintiff:
Hancock Whitney Bank and Hancock Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bowman v. Hancock et al
as 3:2018cv00656
Defendant:
Sid Lockhart and Teddy Hancock
Plaintiff:
Edith Carlette Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hancock Bank v. Pastore et al
as 1:2018cv00179
Defendant:
Tricia M. Pastore, Alexander Pastore and Amicus Mortgage Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cope v. Hancock et al
as 5:2018cv00552
Plaintiff:
Denise Cope
Defendant:
Daniel Hancock, Wolfe Jones Hancock Daniel & South LLC, Scott Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hancock Bank v. Moeini
as 1:2017cv00554
Plaintiff:
Hancock Bank
Defendant:
Mehdi Moeini
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
