Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hanks v. City of Sikeston et al
as 1:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Steve Hanks
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Scott County, Missouri Highway Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arkulari v. Prison Medical Staff et al
as 8:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Hank Arkulari
Defendant:
Prison Medical Staff, Prison Medical Director, Prison Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arkulari v. Sabatka-Rine
as 8:2022cv00395
Petitioner:
Hank Arkulari
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General's Office
Respondent:
Diane Sabatka-Rine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Arkulari v. State of Nebraska Public Defender's Office et al
as 8:2022cv00392
Plaintiff:
Hank Arkulari
Defendant:
State of Nebraska Public Defender's Office and Carlos Monzon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Block v. Hollinger
as 4:2020cv00874
Defendant:
Hank Hollinger
Plaintiff:
Richard Block
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gater v. Carvajal et al
as 2:2020cv00146
Defendant:
Micael D Carvajal, Dewayne Hendrix, Brister and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanke v. Drew County Jail et al
as 5:2019cv00244
Defendant:
Drew County Jail, Doe, James Slaughter and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Paul Hanke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Minnesota Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2018cv02142
Plaintiff:
Jason Everett Hanks, Jr.
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Matt Johnson, Zach Nuehring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2018cv00686
Plaintiff:
Jason Hanks
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Miles Kranz, Janelle M. Cheney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanks v. Hills et al
as 0:2015cv04275
Plaintiff:
Clayton James Hanks
Defendant:
Jason Hills , Dustin Engh , Michael Marcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
