Cases 41 - 50 of 155
Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee et al v. State of North Carolina, et al
as 7:2020cv00029
Defendant:
Jeff McCracken, County of Orange, James T. Bryan, III and others
Plaintiff:
Napier Sandford Fuller and Anti-Tranny Political Action Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowis v. Burns et al
as 7:2019cv03353
Plaintiff:
Harry Dowis
Defendant:
Chuck Burns, Hardees Food Systems LLC and Hardees Restaurant LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Moskos v. James Hardee
as 19-7611
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HORNE, KATHERINE BUTLER, LARON LOCKLEAR and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES GARY MOSKOS
Martin v. Hardee's
as 3:2019cv00287
Plaintiff:
Tommy E. Martin
Defendant:
Hardee's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardee v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2019cv00428
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Barbara Todd Hardee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02447
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
P. et al v. CKE Restaurants Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00483
Defendant:
CKE Restaurants Holdings, Inc., Hardee's Food Systems LLC, Hardee's Restaurants LLC and others
Plaintiff:
S. F. and E. P.
Hardee et al v. Carteret County et al
as 5:2018ct03006
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Hardee and Carol M. Hardee
Defendant:
Carteret County , Asa B. Buck , Daniel King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardee et al v. Carteret County et al
as 7:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Charles C. Hardee and Carol M. Hardee
Defendant:
Carteret County , Asa B. Buck , Daniel King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hunter El v. State of South Carolina Government et al
as 3:2017cv03373
Plaintiff:
Regina M. Hunter El
Defendant:
State of South Carolina Government, Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
