Cases 1 - 10 of 863
Bralen Jordan v. Johnny Leonwicsy, et al
as 22-2832
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNY LEONWICSY, Captain, KENNETH DUGDALE, C. HORST and others
Bralen Jordan v. Johnny Leonwicsy, et al
as 22-2741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRALEN LAMAR JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHNNY LEONWICSY, Captain, KENNETH DUGDALE, C. HORST and others
Jordan v. Leonwicsy et al
as 3:2022cv50288
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Defendant:
Johnny Leonwicsy, Kenneth Dugdale, C. Horst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alvin Darrell Smith v. United States et al
as 5:2022cv00702
Plaintiff:
Alvin Darrell Smith
Defendant:
United States, Michael D. Carvajal, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wallace Mitchell v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 21-3355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WALLACE MITCHELL
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director-Bureau of Prisons, THOMAS R. KANE, Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, Administrator/Bureau of Prisons and others
Mitchell v. Lappin et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Defendant:
Kevin Bittenbender, Mark Preoria, David C. Young and others
Plaintiff:
Wallace Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Scott v. Northam et al
as 1:2020cv01113
Defendant:
Pocahontas Correctional Center, Ralph Northam, USP Marion, IL. and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv02830
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, B. True, Harley Lappin and others
Petitioner:
David Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01984
Defendant:
Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ramarize, Cruize and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. Sawyor et al
as 1:2020cv01097
Defendant:
. Ramarize, Jeffery Ray Ormond, Ian Connors and others
Plaintiff:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
