Cases 21 - 30 of 30
HARO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv03317
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HARO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haro v. C.R. Bard Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01269
Defendant:
Davol Inc and C.R. Bard Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jose Haro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARO v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
as 2:2018cv12223
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
DELORES HARO
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARO v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01597
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
Fernando Haro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Haro v. GGP-Tucson Mall LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Maria Haro
Defendant:
GGP-Tucson Mall LLC , Millard Mall Services Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Glenda Austin et al v. Bayer Healthcare et al
as 2:2014cv08284
Plaintiff:
Rufaida Alfarouk, Rosa Arteaga, Glenda Austin and others
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Does and McKesson Corporation
Guzman-Haro v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv01466
Plaintiff:
Celia Guzman-Haro
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Suzanne Haro v. ABM Industries Incorporated et al
as 8:2014cv00528
Defendant:
ABM Industries Incorporated and Does
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Haro
Haro et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv10040
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Haro and Juan A. Haro
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tattan et al v. Hayani et al
as 1:2008cv06585
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Tattan and James McConnel
Defendant:
Ammar Hayani, Louis Torero, Janet Meller and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
