Cases 11 - 20 of 291
Hamrick et al v. Rutherford County et al
as 1:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Michelle Hamrick and Hayley Harrison
Defendant:
Rutherford County, John K Carroll, Kimber Dover-Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. Harrison
as 3:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
William A. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
SYMMES v. NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS et al
as 1:2022cv00225
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY - DPS, RONALD COVINGTON, JERRY INGRAM, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalk v. Miller et al
as 1:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert Harrison Kalk
Defendant:
Quinten Miller, Jeffrey Littrell and Buncombe County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anderson v. Herring et al
as 5:2021ct03289
Plaintiff:
Albert Marquavious Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Warden Herring, Mark Fleming, Maury Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Jacobs
as 5:2021ct03264
Plaintiff:
Marqueion Jamal Harrison
Defendant:
Mr. Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Jacobs
as 5:2021hc02118
Respondent:
Mr. Jacobs
Petitioner:
Marqueion Jamal Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Harrison v. Lumberton Correctional Institute
as 5:2021ct03093
Defendant:
Lumberton Correctional Institution, Sergent D. Hunt, Lieutenant Moody and others
Plaintiff:
Marqueion Jamal Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SYMMES v. COVINGTON et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
VICTOR LOCKLEAR, ANGELA M. DELLARIPA, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS ROY SYMMES, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
