Cases 1 - 10 of 208
Scott v. McLennan County Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Bennie Daryl Scott
Defendant:
McLennan County Texas, Parnell McNamara, Ricky Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Webster et al
as 2:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Quinton Webster, Titus Webster and Rodney Hayden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barnett v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Caroline S. Barnett
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Federal Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Frederick v. Sanesco International Inc
as 3:2023cv02176
Plaintiff:
Hayden Frederick
Defendant:
Sanesco International, Inc. and Sanesco International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Hayden v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2023cv04333
Plaintiff:
Justin Hayden
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hayden v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02914
Plaintiff:
Danny Hayden
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Moreno v. City of Victoria et al
as 6:2023cv00026
Plaintiff:
Johnny Moreno
Defendant:
City of Victoria, City of Victoria Police Department, Council for City of Victoria and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
McGee v. Hayden et al
as 6:2023cv00205
Plaintiff:
Karl Lynn McGee
Defendant:
NFN Hayden and Tyler Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
