Cases 1 - 10 of 100
K' Darius West v. Doug Branham
as 26-6070
Plaintiff:
K' DARIUS WEST
Defendant:
OFFICER DOUG BRANHAM, SERGEANT A. W. BENTLEY, MAJOR CHRISTOPHER KING and others
Andy Ralston v. Harold Clarke
as 25-6715
Plaintiff:
ANDY LEWIS RALSTON
Defendant:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, former Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, MELVIN DAVIS, Warden, Coffeewood Correctional Center, E. D. SALES, Unit Manager, Coffeewood Correctional Center and others
Haymes v. River County Drug and Violence Task Force
as 5:2025cv00124
Plaintiff:
Carlton Stanley Haymes, II
Defendant:
River County Drug and Violence Task Force
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
K' Darius West v. Doug Branham
as 25-6536
Plaintiff:
K' DARIUS WEST
Defendant:
OFFICER DOUG BRANHAM, SERGEANT A. W. BENTLEY, MAJOR CHRISTOPHER KING and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra Race Discrimination
Phoenix v. Dotson, et al
as 3:2024cv00625
Defendant:
David Robinson, Dana Watson, Darrell Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Defour v. Hall et al
as 7:2024cv00472
Defendant:
Investigator Stanley, Special Agent Acosta, Sergeant Steffey and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Defour
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar Haymes v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1926
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI
Plaintiff:
LAMAR HAYMES
HAYMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12378
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LARRYRON HAYMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
