Cases 31 - 40 of 247
IN RE: ICE LIBOR ANTITRUST LIT
as 20-1492
Plaintiff / Appellant:
City of Livonia Retiree Health amd Disability Benefits Plan, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Hawaii Sheet Metal Workers Annuity Fund, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, City of Livonia Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Merill Lynch, Pierce Fenner & Smith Inc., MUFG Bank, Ltd., The Norinchukin Bank and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute
Takeda Pharmaceutical Company v. United Food and Commercial Wor
as 20-481
Respondent:
NECA-IBEW Welfare Trust Fund, individually and on behalf of all others similarly sitiated, A.F. of L. - A.G.C. Buildings Trade Welfare Plan, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plumbers & Pipefitters Local 178 Health & Welfare Trust Fund and others
Petitioner:
Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharmaceuitcals U.S.A., Inc. and others
In re: Seroquel XR (Extended Release Quetiapine Fumarate) Litigation All End-Payor Class Actions
as 1:2019cv08296
Defendant:
Accord Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Astrazeneca LP, Astrazeneca UK Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Law Enforcement Health Benefits, Inc., Pipe Trades Services MN Welfare Fund, Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, Maryland and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Ahold U.S.A., Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Public Limited, et al
as 19-8014
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, TEAMSTERS LOCAL 237 WELFARE BENEFITS FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, LUPIN LTD., WARNER CHILCOTT CORPORATION and others
Respondent:
AHOLD U.S.A., INC.
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS, ASSOCIATION FOR ACCESSIBLE MEDICINES, PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH AND MANUFACTURERS OF AMERICA and others
City of Providence, et al v. Warner Chilcott (US), LLC, et al
as 19-8026
Petitioner:
WARNER CHILCOTT SALES (US), LLC, WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WARNER CHILCOTT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
KROGER COMPANY, MARY ALEXANDER, a resident citizen of the State of North Carolina, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, WALGREEN CO. and others
Respondent:
ELECTRICAL WORKERS 242 & 294 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS LOCAL 1776 & PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 35 HEALTH CARE FUND, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Interested Party:
BAYER HEALTHCARE, LLC,, CAREMARK, LLC and CVS HEALTH CORPORATION
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, PLC, WARNER CHILCOTT HOLDINGS COMPANY III, LTD., LUPIN LTD. and others
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 1:2019cv09094
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca UK Limited, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and others
Plaintiff:
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In re Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2014md02503
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local No. 25 Health & Welfare Fund, United Food and Commercial Workers Local 1776 & Participating Employers Health and Welfare Fund, Fraternal Order of Police, Fort Lauderdale Lodge 31 and others
Not Classified By Court:
National Medical Health Card Systems, Inc., California Physicians' Service d/b/a Blue Shield of California, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Barr Laboratories, Inc., Matrix Laboratories Ltd., Ranbaxy Laboratories, LTD and others
In Re:
Solodyn (Minocycline Hydrochloride) Antitrust Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Consolidated Plaintiffs
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 269 et al v. LINCOLN WAY ELECTRIC, INC.
as 2:2019mc00166
Petitioner:
ANNUITY FUND, HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, NATIONAL ELECTRICAL BENEFIT FUND and others
Respondent:
LINCOLN WAY ELECTRIC, INC.
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 269 et al v. LINCOLN WAY ELECTRIC, INC.
as 3:2019cv12176
Petitioner:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 269 ANNUITY FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 269 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY FUND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS LOCAL 269 JATC FUND and others
Respondent:
LINCOLN WAY ELECTRIC, INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff:
International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
People of the State of California
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
