Cases 1 - 10 of 298
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Employment Discrimination
John Doe v. United States Probation Office, Eastern District o, et al
as 24-5314
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE, LAWSON BURROW, Officer, AMBER WILSON, Officer and others
Jaquan Lee v. Heath Underwood, et al
as 24-3271
Plaintiff:
JAQUAN LEE
Defendant:
HEATH UNDERWOOD, AARON BUSHEY, DAVID SCHEURER and others
Baker v. Green
as 0:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ashley Heath A Baker
Defendant:
Warden Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath v. Anderson et al
as 2:2024cv10682
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Heath
Defendant:
Adrian Anderson, Gary Charles Cole, Jr. and Oscoda County of
Heath v. Cole et al
as 1:2024cv10568
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Heath and Mark Andrew Heath [E-filer]
Defendant:
Gary Charles Cole, Jr., Adrian Anderson and Oscoda, County of
Heath v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Robin Heath
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Doe v. United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
United States Probation Office of the Eastern District of Tennessee, Lawson Burrow, Amber Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath et al v. General Motors, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv12898
Plaintiff:
Douglas Heath, Emil Heiple, Brian Lisse and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Dion HeathIn re: Dion Heath
as 23-3902
Petitioner:
In re: DION HEATH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
