Cases 31 - 40 of 1,251
WALL v. LUPPE et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
NATHAN CLAUDE WALL
Defendant:
Heather Huppe, CAPTAIN BRIAN CAVE, KATIE CAVE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Drulman et al v. Koninkelijke Philips N.V. et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Troy Drulman and Heather Drulman
Defendant:
Koninkelijke Philips N.V., Philips North America LLC, Philips Holding USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ashley #136985 v. Coe et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Carl Ashley #136985
Defendant:
E'Coe Hill, Heather Doolittle, Jacob Clapper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Materu v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00019
Interested Party:
SSA
Plaintiff:
Heather Materu
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Brown v. Boardman et al.
as 1:2023cv02446
Plaintiff:
Heather Brown
Defendant:
Eric Boardman and Stephanie Boardman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
John Doe, et al v. Dana Nessel, et al
as 23-2097
Plaintiff:
TIM BROWN, JOHN DOE and TIMOTHY RONALD BROWN
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DANA NESSEL, ANICA LETICA, ONE COURT OF JUSTICE, Judges and others
Jenkins v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv13188
Plaintiff:
Daniel Antaun Jenkins
Defendant:
Pamela Young, Valerie Miller, Heather Zimmermann and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv13055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
