Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv04071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Larry Muldrow v. State of Arkansas, et al
as 23-1813
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Larry Muldrow
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Arkansas, Hempstead County, Arkansas, Miller County, Arkansas and others
Muldrow v. State of Arkansas et al
as 4:2022cv04122
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Muldrow
Defendant:
State of Arkansas, Hempstead County, Arkansas, Miller County, Arkansas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Middleton v. Hempstead County, Arkansas
as 4:2018cv04112
Plaintiff:
Gary Middleton
Defendant:
Hempstead County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gay v. Roberts et al
as 4:2016cv04034
Plaintiff:
Marcus T. Gay, Sr.
Defendant:
Steven Roberts, Thomas Allgood, Tony Yocom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Nelson v. City of Hope Hempstead County Arkansas et al
as 4:2016cv04009
Plaintiff:
Alisa Nelson
Defendant:
City of Hope Hempstead County Arkansas, Ramsey and Catherine Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCauley v. Hempstead County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2015cv04109
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray McCauley, Jr.
Defendant:
Hempstead County, Arkansas, Johnny Godbolt, James Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Casiano-Perkins v. Hempstead County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2015cv04001
Plaintiff:
Erick Lynn Casiano-Perkins
Defendant:
Hempstead County, Arkansas, Officer Young, Cecilia Bland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reliford v. Ross et al
as 4:2014cv04099
Plaintiff:
Melvin Todd Reliford
Defendant:
Heath Ross and Hempstead County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhommad v. Hempstead County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2014cv04032
Defendant:
Hempstead County, Arkansas, James Singleton, Johnny Godbolt and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Perry Muhommad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
