Cases filed in the Sixth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,648
Henry v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02578
Plaintiff: Gary Henry
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hopkins et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02524
Plaintiff: Henry Hopkins and Ebony Smith
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00273
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martinez v. Healy
as 4:2024cv00833
Petitioner: Henry Ermy Martinez
Respondent: Warden Ian Healy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hatcher v. State of TN et al
as 3:2024cv00583
Petitioner: Henry Roosevelt Hatcher, III and Hank Gunther
Respondent: State of TN, Metro and Emma l/n/u
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bennett v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02242
Plaintiff: Robert Henry Bennett
Defendant: C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
May v. Calhoun, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff: Herbert May
Defendant: Calhoun, County of, Kurtis Cunkle, Sterling Ladd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Zepf Center
as 3:2024cv00810
Plaintiff: Henry Martinez
Defendant: Zepf Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Gordon v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02181
Plaintiff: Henry Gordon, III
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Price v. Plappert et al
as 5:2024cv00083
Plaintiff: Henry Price, III
Defendant: Laura Plappert, Cookie Crews, Courtney Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?