Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Henry Rayford v. Johnny Crain, Jr., et al
as 20-30385
Defendant / Appellee:
APRIL DOE, JOHNNY CRAIN, JR., LISA CRAIN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY RAYFORD
Rayford v. Crain et al
as 2:2019cv12348
Defendant:
Denise Robertson, Lisa Crain, April Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Rayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henry Rayford v. Bogalusa City, et al
as 18-30386
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HENRY RAYFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
BOGALUSA CITY, JOE CULPEPPER, Chief of Police, JAMES COCKRELL, PFC, Individually and As Police Officer of the Bogalusa Police Department and others
Henry Rayford v. Bogalusa City
as 18-30386
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Henry Rayford
Defendant / Appellee:
Bogalusa City, Joe Culpepper, Chief of Police, James Cockrell, PFC, Individually and As Police Officer of the Bogalusa Police Department and others
Rayford v. Bogalusa City et al
as 2:2015cv01296
Plaintiff:
Henry Rayford
Defendant:
Bogalusa City , Joe Culpepper , James Cockrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Henry Privette, Jr.
as 12-7450
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HENRY RAYFORD PRIVETTE, JR., a/k/a H. R. Privette, a/k/a Ray Picard, d/b/a Carolina Furniture, Incorporated, d/b/a carolinafurniture.com, d/b/a Henry Ray Furniture Export, Incorporated, d/b/a Carolina Furniture Factory Direct from High Point, NC, Incorpor
Sealed Defendant v. USA
as 7:2011cv00145
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Henry Rayford Privette, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Henry Privette, Jr.
as 09-4115
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
HENRY RAYFORD PRIVETTE, JR., a/k/a H. R. Privette, a/k/a Ray Picard, d/b/a Carolina Furniture, Incorporated, d/b/a carolinafurniture.com, d/b/a Henry Ray Furniture Export, Incorporated, d/b/a Carolina Furniture Factory Direct from High Point, NC, Incorpor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
