Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lansdell v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2023cv00076
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lansdell
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and James Herbert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
USA v. Herbert Smith
as 22-3201
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
HERBERT SMITH
Edwards et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway et al
as 1:2021cv05096
Plaintiff:
Joyce Edwards, Jonathan Edwards, Jarvis Edwards and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway, Norfolk Southern Police Department, Mark D. Mathewson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Naster v. Harrell et al
as 6:2021cv00744
Plaintiff:
Blaine Alan Naster
Defendant:
Tyler Harrell and Herbert Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv93099
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HERBERT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv41705
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HERBERT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00384
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Herbert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02186
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Herbert Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nicholson et al v. Gary City of et al
as 2:2018cv00257
Plaintiff:
Douglas Grimes, Jeff Nicholson, Greg Serbon and others
Defendant:
Herbert Jr Smith, Lavetta Sparks-Wade, Carolyn D Rogers and others
Intervenor:
Indiana State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
L.S. et.al. et al v. County of Santa Cruz et al
as 5:2015cv03032
Plaintiff:
Herbert Smith , S. L. and S. W.
Defendant:
County of Santa Cruz and California Forensic Medical Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
