Cases 61 - 70 of 796
Steven Hernandez-Solito v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3062
Petitioner:
STEVEN OMAR HERNANDEZ-SOLITO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Ortiz Hernandez v. BigTop Wyoming Inc.
as 1:2023cv00070
Plaintiff:
Teodoro Ortiz Hernandez
Defendant:
BigTop Wyoming INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
USA v. Jose Zazueta-Hernandez
as 22-4063
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE DANIEL ZAZUETA-HERNANDEZ, aka Jesus Bojorquez
Goudlock v. Fuller et al
as 3:2022cv02199
Plaintiff:
Jason Goudlock
Defendant:
Lt. Fuller, Mullinex, Juan Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Maria Lopez-Hernandez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3990
Petitioner:
MARIA LUPITA LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ, YEILIN NICOHOL AYALA-LOPEZ and YEIRIN JULISSA AYALA-LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Francisco Hernandez-Tumax v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3982
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO ADRIAN HERNANDEZ-TUMAX
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Wilcoxon v. Bernard et al
as 5:2022cv12779
Plaintiff:
D. Etta Wilcoxon
Defendant:
Linda Bernard, Willie Bell, Annie Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
King et al v. Hernandez
as 3:2022cv00906
Plaintiff:
Bill W. King, Jr. and Sheet Metal Workers National Health Fund
Defendant:
Eric Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Aida Molina Gutierrez, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 22-3927
Petitioner:
AIDA MOLINA GUTIERREZ and CRISTIAN ADALID HERNANDEZ MILINA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Sheldon v. Management & Training Corp. et al
as 3:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
Gerrick Sheldon and Derrick Sheldon
Defendant:
Management & Training Corp., fnu Shenafield, fnu Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
