Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 8,968
United States of America v. Carvajal-Barrios (Alcala Cordones)
as 24-1152
Defendant: HUGO ARMANDO CARVAJAL-BARRIOS, LUCIANO MARIN ARANGO, SEUXIS PAUCIS HERNANDEZ SOLARTE and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Monjarrez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1130
Petitioner: BELINDA ARACELY MONJARREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Johnson v. Ocasio-Montanez, et al
as 24-1423
Petitioner: OBE E. JOHNSON
Respondent: LUIS OCASIO-MONTANEZ and DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ
US v. Morales-Hernandez
as 24-1398
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: ANGEL L. MORALES-HERNANDEZ, a/k/a Angel, a/k/a Chinese Checker
INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. v. WNEK et al
as 2:2024cv05659
Plaintiff: INNOVATIVE SPORTS MANAGEMENT, INC. doing business as INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA
Defendant: STANLEY WNEK, GUSTAVO A. PALACIOS and ESPINDOLA-HERNANDEZ, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Avendano Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-1096
Petitioner: GASPAR AVENDANO HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hernandez-Pineda v. Garland
as 24-1092
Petitioner: JOSE HERNANDEZ-PINEDA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Flores Limon, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2584
Plaintiff: BEATRIZ FLORES LIMON and JOSE ANTONIO HERNANDEZ REYES
Defendant: LOREN K. MILLER, Director, Nebraska Service Center, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in his official capacity as well as his successors and assigns, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity as well as his successors and assigns, UR M. JADDOU, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, in her official capacity as well as her successor and assigns and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?