Cases 11 - 20 of 144
AirPro Diagnostics, LLC v. Drew Technologies, Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv12969
Plaintiff:
AirPro Diagnostics, LLC
Defendant:
Drew Technologies, Incorporated, Opus IVS, Incorporated, AutoEnginuity, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
AirPro Diagnostics, LLC v. Drew Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01159
Plaintiff:
AirPro Diagnostics, LLC
Defendant:
Drew Technologies, Inc., OPUS IVS, INC., AutoEnginuity, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv12695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Henson v. Burke et al
as 5:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Ann Nicole Henson
Defendant:
Amy Burke, Janet Humphrey-Cole, Megan N. Bosley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Alford v. Pressley et al
as 2:2022cv03098
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Alford
Defendant:
Mr. Pressley, Ms. Hoying, Mr. Herron and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Core Civic et al
as 1:2022cv01160
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hininger, Dr. Yvoune Neau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slodowski v. CCG Ventures, Inc. d/b/a CBS
as 1:2022cv11697
Plaintiff:
Tracey Slodowski, Yvonne Herron, Stephanie Gunn and others
Defendant:
CBS Interactive, Inc. and CCG Ventures, Inc. Doing business as CBS
Webster v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2022cv00535
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hininger, Yvonne Neau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webster v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Javon Webster
Defendant:
Core Civic, Damon Hininger, Yvonne Neau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Herron v. Santi et al
as 2:2022cv10268
Plaintiff:
Erika Herron
Defendant:
Paul Santi, Hladik, Onorato & Federman LLP, The Hop Law Group and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
