Cases 41 - 50 of 1,041
Russell v. Wynne et al
as 4:2023cv01063
Plaintiff:
Derrick L Russell
Defendant:
Wynne, Melanie Martin, Eric S Higgins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. Rivers
as 3:2023cv02436
Petitioner:
Joshua N Higgins
Respondent:
C Rivers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Smith v. Acker-Wynn et al
as 4:2023cv01031
Plaintiff:
Joseph Smith
Defendant:
Acker-Wynne, Eric S Higgins, Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Hopkins
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, D Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01000
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lynn Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Elizabeth Kanopsic and Ron Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01001
Plaintiff:
Kevin L Hamilton, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Lattimore, Mussadic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Skinner et al
as 4:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Dakota Kelly
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, William Sperfslage, Shawn Howard and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Skinner et al
as 4:2023cv00404
Plaintiff:
Duane Yates
Defendant:
Beth Skinner, William Sperfslage, Shawn Howard and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Dean et al
as 4:2023cv00906
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Hopkins
Defendant:
Dean, Austin, Masudibb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00905
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Hopkins
Defendant:
Eric S Higgins, Dinese Atwood and George Belt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
