Cases 1 - 10 of 67
ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES LLC v. HIGHMARK WEST VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01513
Plaintiff:
ABIRA MEDICAL LABORATORIES LLC doing business as GENESIS DIAGNOSTICS
Defendant:
HIGHMARK WEST VIRGINIA, INC. doing business as HIGHMARK BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD WEST VIRGINIA, ABC COMPANIES 1-100 and JOHN DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
de Moor et al v. Anthem Blue Cross et al
as 4:2023cv00968
Defendant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc., Hawaii Medical Services Corporation doing business as Hawaii Medical Services Association also known as Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Hawaii, Rocky Mountain Hospital and Medical Service, Inc. formerly known as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Colorado doing business as Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nevada and others
Plaintiff:
MD Carrie de Moor and Code 3 Emergency Physicians, P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Smyth et al v. Stonewall Jackson Memorial Hospital Company et al
as 2:2022cv00019
Plaintiff:
Christopher Adam Smyth and Stephanie Smyth
Defendant:
Stonewall Jackson Memorial Hospital Company, Fidelity Security Life Insurance Company, Highmark West Virginia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01256
Plaintiff:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Automobile Club of Southern California, Darling Ingredients Inc and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc d/b/a ANthem Blue Cross LIfe and Health Insurance Company agent of WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
JetBlue Airways Corporation et al v. Anthem Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00558
Plaintiff:
JetBlue Airways Corporation, JetBlue Airways Group Health Insurance Plan, Kraft Heinz Company, The and others
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly doing business as WELLPOINT INC, Blue Cross of California, Blue Cross of Southern California, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2022cv00265
Defendant:
Anthem Inc formerly known as WELLPOINT INC doing business as Anthem Blue Cross Life and Health Insurance Company doing business as Blue Cross of California doing business as BLUE CROSS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA doing business as Blue Cross of Northern C, Independence Health Group Inc and Independence Hospital Indemnity Plan Inc, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama and others
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Coronado Global Resources, Inc. et al v. J.S. et al
as 5:2021cv00651
Plaintiff:
Coronado Global Resources, Inc. and Highmark West Virginia Inc. doing business as Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield
Defendant:
J. S., Amanda Sizemore and Robert B. Kuenzel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Metropolitan Transportation Authority et al v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 1:2021cv09101
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Transportation Authority, New York City Transit Authority, Manhattan And Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, PREMERA and Premera Blue Cross, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Arizona, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Reyes v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2021cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mishanta Reyes
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem Inc, Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Highmark Inc. et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00507
Plaintiff:
Highmark West Virginia Inc., Highmark BCBSD Inc., Highmark Inc. and others
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
