Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Hitachi Capital America Corp. v. Lakeland Regional Health System
as 0:2017cv00429
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Capital America Corp.
Defendant:
Lakeland Regional Health System and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Lakeland Regional Health System
Thirdparty_defendant:
Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hitachi Capital America Corp v. The Amerivac Group, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00886
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Capital America Corp
Defendant:
The Amerivac Group, Inc., Cynthia Sharkey and Brian Pacey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COFUND II LLC v. HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP.
as 2:2016cv01790
Plaintiff:
COFUND II LLC
Defendant:
HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hitachi Capital America Corp v. August Schmidt Co et al
as 2:2014cv01026
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Capital America Corp
Defendant:
August Schmidt Co, Arthur Skalitzky, Michelle Herriges and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hitachi Capital America Corp v. Shiloh Imaging Center LLC et al
as 5:2011cv01126
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Capital America Corp
Defendant:
Shiloh Imaging Center LLC, Diagnostic Medical Imaging Consultants LLC, Larry Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hitachi Capital America Corp. v. Greenville Lift Trucks, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00184
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Capital America Corp.
Defendant:
Greenville Lift Trucks, Inc. and Paul Earvin Oswalt, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hitachi Capital America Corp.
as 3:2009cv00571
Plaintiff:
Hitachi Capital America Corp.
Defendant:
Opensided MRI of Cleveland, L.L.C., Opensided MRI of Denver, L.L.C., Opensided MRI of Kansas, L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP. v. NUSSBAUM SALES CORP.
as 2:2009cv00731
Plaintiff:
HITACHI CAPITAL AMERICA CORP.
Defendant:
NUSSBAUM SALES CORP.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
