Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 339
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-16368
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: JOHN FINN and LAURA TOWNSEND FORTMAN
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16373
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant: ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and as Administrator of the Estate of the late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Defendant - Appellee: TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
MetroPCS Wireless Inc v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv02576
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Defendant: Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation, Toshiba America Electronic Components Inc and others
Plaintiff: MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Compucom Systems Inc et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv02948
Defendant: NEC Display Solutions of America Inc, NEC Corporation of America, Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: CompuCom Systems Inc
Consolidated Plaintiff: MetroPCS Wireless Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Schultze Agency Services, LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv05875
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: Schultze Agency Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Neco Alliance LLC v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05831
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Neco Alliance LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv05827
Defendant: NEC LCD Technologies LTD, NEC Corporation of America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Special Master: Martin Quinn
Plaintiff: P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation, ABC Appliance, Inc. and Marta Cooperative of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sharp Electronics Corporation, et al v. Hitachi, Ltd., et al
as 14-16817
: In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHARP ELECTRONICS CORPORATION and SHARP ELECTRONICS MANUFACTURING COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC.
Plaintiff - Appellee: DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee: HITACHI, LTD., HITACHI AMERICA, LTD., HITACHI ASIA, LTD. and others
Crago et al v. Mitsubishi Electric Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv02058
Plaintiff: Crago , Arch Electronics, Inc , Meijer, Inc. and others
Defendant: Mitsubishi Electric Corporation , Technicolor USA, Inc., Technicolor SA and others
Miscellaneou: Samsung SDI America, Inc., Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., Samsung SDI Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. and others
Pecial_master: Vaughn R. Walker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Best Buy Co., Inc. et al v. Technicolor SA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv05264
Plaintiff: Best Buy Co., Inc. , Best Buy Purchasing LLC , Best Buy Enterprise Services, Inc. and others
Defendant: Technicolor SA, Technicolor USA, Inc., Videocon Industries, Ltd. and others
Miscellaneou: Samsung SDI America Inc , SAMSUNG SDI CO., LTD , Samsung SDI (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?