Cases 1 - 10 of 36
HODAK v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00217
Defendant:
OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD
Plaintiff:
Nick Hodak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05058
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodak Sales, Inc. v. Processing Resources International, Inc.
as 1:2017cv08047
Plaintiff:
Hodak Sales, Inc.
Defendant:
Processing Resources International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
LITTLE v. HODAK et al
as 2:2017cv01277
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN B. LITTLE
Defendant:
HODAK, SUSAN BERGEY, KOSTRYK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodak v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2015cv02026
Plaintiff:
Sue Anne Hodak
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Joseph McDaniels v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv02594
Defendant:
Agular, Agular, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph McDaniels
Brodrick T Collins v. Ross Quinn et al
as 5:2013cv00308
Defendant:
Kenyatta, M Martinez, Angel Ortiz and others
Plaintiff:
Brodrick T Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Njos v. Norwood, et al
as 12-57273
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SCOTT NJOS
Defendant:
NORWOOD, CEO, Victorville Complex Warden, HODAK, Captain, Victorville Complex, ENZELLE, USP Victorville, Lieutenant and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOURN, USP Victorville, Captain, HURTE, USP Victorville, Lieutenant, MOYER, Officer and others
Scott Njos v. USDC-CARIV
as 12-70746
:
In re: SCOTT NJOS
Petitioner:
SCOTT NJOS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, RIVERSIDE
Real Party In Interest:
J.L. NORWOOD, HODAK, BOURNE and others
Timothy Holz v. Robert McFadden, et al
as 11-56418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY EDWARD HOLZ
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, Regional Director, J. L. NORWOOD, FCC Warden, HODAK, Captain, SIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
