Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Meeks v. DOE et al
as 4:2023cv01240
Plaintiff:
Frisco Meeks
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, Daniel Golden, Lauren Colom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Durden et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01539
Defendant:
Miguel Van Brankle, Christina Lanier, Shaequana Galloway and others
Plaintiff:
Quantina Peebles, Police Officers "JOHN DOE" #1-5, Shaqueena Durden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holbert v. Cimarron County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2020cv00887
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Cimarron County, John Does, Cimarron County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dwilene Holbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Holbert et al v. Laurens County et al
as 6:2020cv01177
Defendant:
Laurens County and Dale Satterfield
Plaintiff:
Ron Smith, Zach Jamison and Cathy Holbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Kenneth Liggins v. J. Holbert
as 17-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MIKE HOLBERT, Board of Supervisor for Clarke County, KEITH R. DALTON, Berryville Town Manager, CLARKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv08394
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Michael Adams v. Barry Parson
as 13-1262
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ADAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN P. BARKER, JR., all individually and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BARRY PARSONS, M. G. ROBINSON, R. D. SIZEMORE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
