Cases 1 - 10 of 487
Michael Mattingly v. Marc McCune, et al
as 24-1372
Plaintiff:
Michael Mattingly
Defendant:
Judge Marc McCune, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and Public Defender Aaron Edwards
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jackson v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Derrick Jackson
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fryer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. Precythe et al
as 6:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lee Holmes
Defendant:
Director Anne L. Precythe, Michelle Buckner, John Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Israel v. Fenner et al
as 4:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
CessanadaKha Jahish Israel
Defendant:
Duane Edward Fenner, Holmes, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tayborn v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01212
Plaintiff:
Reginald Tayborn
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, C Hendrick, Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holmes v. AmerCable Corporation
as 1:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Steven Holmes
Defendant:
Amercable Corporation doing business as Nexans Amercable, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Carter et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2023cv01548
Plaintiff:
Michael Carter, Brian Cosby, Ernest Snipes and others
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, City of St. Louis Refuse Division and Timothy Banta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
