Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Armstrong v. The United States Federal Government et al
as 4:2023cv04139
Plaintiff:
Ryan Christopher Armstrong
Defendant:
The United States Federal Government, The State of Illinois, Kwame Raoul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Kiontae Mack v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIONTAE MACK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, PAUL MADERER, Detective, Star No. 21246, DAVID ROBERTS, Detective, Star No. 20764 and others
Otis v. Zurich America Insurance Company et al
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jill Otis and Jill L Otis
Defendant:
Zurich America Insurance Company, Kwik Trip Inc, Travis Hoover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEARD v. GOODWILL OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN INDIANA, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv01413
Defendant:
GOODWILL OF CENTRAL AND SOUTHERN INDIANA, INC., JOSEPH H. HOGSETT, Board of Directors of The Excel Center, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff:
Dionne Leard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05507
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Mack v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv04001
Defendant:
Sgt. Hoover, P.O. Robinson, K. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Kiontae Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOOVER v. CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00125
Defendant:
DEREK CRAWFORD and CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
VINCENT NELL HOOVER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00005
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
HOOVER v. BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY
as 4:2018cv00230
Plaintiff:
VINCENT NELL HOOVER, JR.
Defendant:
BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
