Cases 21 - 30 of 403
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MATTHEWS v. GOOD et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
JAMAR MATTHEWS
Defendant:
SERGEANT GOOD, LIEUTENANT HUSTOSKY, SUPERINTENDENT HAINSWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Malichaik et al
as 1:2023cv01124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
L. Malichaik, Bobbi Jo Salomon, M. Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover et al v. Cleo AI , Inc.
as 3:2023cv01067
Plaintiff:
Karen Hoover, Tom Baker and Vera Beckford
Defendant:
Cleo AI, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Srvs. Employment & Reemployment Rights Act
CLARK v. ZBOROVANCIK
as 3:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
MARK CLARK
Defendant:
BRIAN ZBOROUANCIK, BRIAN ZBOROVANCIK, ADAM CLARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Ndaula v. Clinton County Correctional Facility, et al
as 22-3440
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER WHITE NDAULA
Defendant / Appellee:
CLINTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ANGELA HOOVER, JASON KORMANIC, Assitant Warden of Operations and others
USA v. Paul Hoover
as 22-2427
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PAUL MICHAEL HOOVER
MARSHALL v. LOMBARDO et al
as 1:2022cv04404
Plaintiff:
CAROLE MAE MARSHALL
Defendant:
WARDEN DONALD J LOMBARDO, CAPTAIN MAYQUIL, LT. CAMBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02545
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
