Cases 31 - 40 of 246
Collins v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2022cv01740
Plaintiff:
DeJesus Collins
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Bill Beaman, Getachew, . and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Speedway LLC
as 3:2022cv00285
Plaintiff:
Brenda Hoover
Defendant:
Speedway LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
US v. Michael Hoover
as 22-4322
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL SCOTT HOOVER
Haley v. Hoover et al
as 1:2022cv01191
Plaintiff:
Leonard Lee Haley
Defendant:
Holly Hoover, Dr. A. Getachew, Dr. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2022cv01173
Plaintiff:
DeJesus Collins
Defendant:
DPSCS, DPSCS Transportation Officers and Officer Hoover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Kijakazi
as 7:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Samantha Hoover
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
McCall v. Division of Corrections (D.O.C.) et al
as 1:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Quinn McCall
Defendant:
Division of Corrections (D.O.C.), C.O. Tart, C.O. Logsdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBSON v. HOOVER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Gibson
Defendant:
HOOVER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES, INC. and MARION ALPHONSE JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hoover v. Corbin et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Hoover
Defendant:
Patricia D. Corbin, Christopher Meyer, Ellen Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hoover v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00044
Petitioner:
Paul Michael Hoover
Respondent:
Warden M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
