Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Horton v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01231
Respondent:
Jeffrey Nines, State of Maryland and Ricky Horton
Petitioner:
Troydrick Horton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bryant Davis v. Darius Horton
as 24-6299
Plaintiff:
BRYANT E. DAVIS, a/k/a Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
DARIUS HORTON, EXPRESS FUNERAL FUNDING, LLC, HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Horton v. Ames
as 3:2023cv00184
Petitioner:
Adonne Horton
Respondent:
Donald F. Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peoples v. Charlotte-Meck Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
William Henry Peoples, lll
Defendant:
Charlotte-Meck Police Department, Public Defenders Office, State of North Carolina Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Horton v. Watts
as 1:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Tavon James Horton
Defendant:
Gail Watts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Horton et al
as 1:2023cv00078
Plaintiff:
Bryant E. Davis and Bryant Davidson
Defendant:
Darius Horton, Express Funeral Funding, Hartford, The Hartford Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
McCann-McCalpine v. Watts et al
as 1:2022cv02195
Plaintiff:
Lydon McCann-McCalpine
Defendant:
Director Gail Watts, Lt McElligott, Sgt Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Fields, Jr. v. Tanner et al
as 9:2022cv00268
Plaintiff:
David Fields, Jr.
Defendant:
P.J. Tanner, Beaufort County, Michael M. Hatfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolfe v. Reid et al
as 5:2021ct03115
Defendant:
Ms. Whitaker, Sgt. Marshall, C/O Howington and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
