Cases 1 - 9 of 9
USA v. Lamont Brown
as 24-5068
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LAMONT HOUSTON BROWN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00319
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Houston Brown v. Garland
as 21-479
Petitioner:
JEMAL MARCUS HOUSTON BROWN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03081
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Steven Hayden v. Robert Vance, Jr., et al
as 16-15326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN MARK HAYDEN, individually and as trustee for William B. Cashion Nevada Spendthrift Trust and William B. Cashion Family Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT S. VANCE, JR., ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, in her individual capacity, J. SCOTT VOWELL, in his individual capacity and others
Steven Hayden v. Robert Vance, Jr., et al
as 16-11305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN MARK HAYDEN, individually and as trustee for William B. Cashion Nevada Spendthrift Trust and William B. Cashion Family Trust
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT S. VANCE, JR., in his individual capacity, ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, in her individual capacity, J. SCOTT VOWELL, in his individual capacity and others
Hayden v. Vance, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00469
Plaintiff:
Steven Mark Hayden
Defendant:
Robert S. Vance, Jr. , Anne-Marie Adams , J. Scott Vowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Perry v. Todd et al
as 2:2013cv00762
Plaintiff:
Lawrence I Perry
Defendant:
Tracie Todd, Houston Brown, Brandon Falls and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
