Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Klinge v. VandeCar et al
as 1:2013cv00213
Petitioner:
Robert L. Klinge
Respondent:
Susan VandeCar, Howard Gibson, Craig Stolsonberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471 Declaratory & Injunctive Relief - Foreclo
Levy v. Suntrust Bank, NA et al
as 1:2012cv01592
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Levy
Defendant:
Suntrust Bank, NA , Howard Gibson and Jellina Gibson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibson et al v. Chase Home Finance LLC
as 7:2011cv03544
Plaintiff:
Howard Gibson and Stacy Gibson
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GIBSON v. WENEROWICZ et al
as 2:2011cv07751
Petitioner:
HOWARD GIBSON
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Willie Polite, et al v. PA Dept Corr, et al
as 10-4156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE E. POLITE, GREGORY STOVER, RAYMOND WILLIAMS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PA DEPT CORR, DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTY GEN PA
POLITE et al v. PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2010cv04344
Petitioner:
WILLIE E. POLITE, ALLEN GINN, GREGORY STOVER and others
Respondent:
PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PA. DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
POLITE et al v. WENEROWICZ
as 2:2010cv03286
Petitioner:
WILLIE E. POLITE, ALLEN GINN, GREGORY STOVER and others
Respondent:
MIKE WENEROWICZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
GIBSON v. DIGUGLIELMO
as 2:2010cv00266
Petitioner:
HOWARD GIBSON
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Serpentfoot v. Rome City Commission et al
as 4:2009cv00187
Plaintiff:
Serpentfoot
Defendant:
Rome City Commission, Rome City Commission, Wright Bagby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
