Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Reggie Huff v. Brookings Police Department, et al
as 24-1776
Plaintiff:
Reggie D. Huff
Defendant:
Brookings Police Department, Dawn M. Elshere, Nominal Defendant, David Erickson and others
Reggie Huff v. Brookings Police Department, et al
as 23-1106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reggie D. Huff
Defendant / Appellee:
Brookings Police Department, Dawn M. Elshere, Nominal Defendant, David Erickson and others
Amos v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 2:2021cv00124
Plaintiff:
Gregory Amos, Jr
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of and Myles Huff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith, et al v. Reynolds County, Missouri et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Defendant:
Tom Stout, Cody Newman, Reynolds County, Missouri and others
Plaintiff:
I. S., Maud Smith and E. S.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Conway, Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Jimmy Weser, Conway, Arkansas, City of, Tanner Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Kaala D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv06006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Williams v. Helena-West Helena Arkansas, City of et al
as 2:2019cv00006
Defendant:
Christopher Franklin, James Patrick Smith, John H Huff, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Sandy Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robison v. Department of Insurance, Finanical Institutions and Professional Registration et al
as 4:2018cv01527
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Chlora Lindley-Myers, John F. Rehagen and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Travis Robison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Turner v. Joplin School District et al
as 3:2018cv05054
Plaintiff:
William Turner
Defendant:
Joplin School District , C.J. Huff, Bud Sexson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
