Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gillespie v. Young et al
as 1:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Robert David Gillespie, Sr.
Defendant:
Lt. S. Young, Deputy Smith, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SORBER et al
as 2:2023cv03426
Plaintiff:
HUGH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JAIME SORBER and GEORGE M LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11046
Plaintiff:
HUGH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv04608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WILLIAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60726
Plaintiff:
HUGH WILLIAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams et al v. Wells et al
as 8:2021cv00986
Plaintiff:
Hugh Williams, George Vaughan, Esq. and Mary Williams
Defendant:
Dr. Keenan Cofield, Berri A. Wells and And All Other Occupants Dr. Keenan Confield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Jones v. Doornbos et al
as 4:2020cv03910
Defendant:
Channel Four (4) News (NBC), Charles Hankes, Jennifer Elaine Doornbos and others
Plaintiff:
William Curtis Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alve et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2020cv04074
Plaintiff:
Chris Garrity, Kenneth Mills, Roberto Garcia and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Daker v. Holmes et al
as 1:2020cv01232
Defendant:
Diane M. Stark, Amelia G. Pray, Kathleen Sherwood and others
Plaintiff:
Waseem Daker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv15866
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH HUGH WILLIAMS JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
