Cases 1 - 10 of 30
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2022cv00008
Plaintiff:
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST
Defendant:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
State of Texas v. Biden
as 21-10806
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas and State of Missouri
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States of America, United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, Law School Clinics, American Civil Liberties Union of Texas and others
HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST v. WOLF et al
as 1:2020cv03764
Defendant:
KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, CHAD F. WOLF, WILLIAM P. BARR and others
Plaintiff:
Human Rights First
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Capital Area Immigrants, et al v. Donald Trump, et al
as 20-5273
Defendant / Appellant:
Executive Office for Immigration Review, United States Customs and Border Protection, Chad F. Wolf, Acting Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Z.B.M., Capital Area Immigrants' Rights Coalition, Refugee and Immigrant Center For Education and Legal Services, Inc. and others
CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2019cv02117
Defendant:
U.S. CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR IMMIGRATION REVIEW and others
Plaintiff:
CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION, REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION AND LEGAL SERVICES, INC., HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST and others
Petitioner:
KIDS IN NEED OF DEFENSE (KIND) and PROFESSORS OF IMMIGRATION LAW
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
PARS EQUALITY CENTER et al v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2017cv00255
Plaintiff:
PARS EQUALITY CENTER, IRANIAN AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL IRANIAN AMERICAN COUNCIL and others
Defendant:
TRUMP, DONALD J. TRUMP, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Petitioner:
HIAS, NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, HOWARD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW CIVIL RIGHTS CLINIC and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICANS UNITED FOR SEPARATION OF CHURCH, VICTOR WILLIAMS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
State of Washington, et al v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 17-35105
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON and STATE OF MINNESOTA
Intervenor - Pending:
DAVID GOLDEN
Defendant - Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, REX W. TILLERSON, Secretary of State and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF HAWAII
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
TECHNOLOGY COMPANIES AND OTHER BUSINESSES, FRED KOREMATSU CENTER FOR LAW AND EQUALITY, LAW PROFESSORS AND CLINICIANS and others
State of Hawaii v. Trump
as 1:2017cv00050
Defendant:
Trump, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Donald J. Trump and others
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii, Ismail Elshikh, Muslim Association of Hawaii, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rabbi Joel Mosbacher, State of Oregon, American Center for Law and Justice and others
Intervenor:
Frederick Banks, Ph.D. Vincent Lucas, Joseph Camp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendment
USA v. Freeman Burkholder
as 13-3214
Amicus Curiae:
PFLAG INTERNATIONAL, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
FREEMAN BURKHOLDER
USA v. Emanuel Schrock
as 13-3208
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
EMANUEL SCHROCK
Amicus Curiae:
THE LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE ON CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AMERICAN-ARAB ANTI-DISCRIMINATION COMMITTEE, CENTRAL CONFERENCE OF AMERICAN RABBIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
