Cases 31 - 40 of 52
Wikimedia Foundation et al v. National Security Agency/Central Security Service et al
as 1:2015cv00662
Plaintiff:
Wikimedia Foundation , National Association of Criminal Defense Attorneys , Human Rights Watch and others
Defendant:
National Security Agency/Central Security Service , Michael S. Rogers , Office of the Director of National Intelligence and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706
Wikimedia Foundation v. NSA/CSS
as 15-2560
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY/ CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE, ADMIRAL MICHAEL S. ROGERS, in his official capacity as Director of the National Security Agency and Chief of the Central Security Service, OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE and others
J. F.M., et al v. Loretta Lynch, et al
as 15-35738
Plaintiff - Appellee:
J. E. F.M., a minor, by and through his Next Friend, Bob Ekblad, J. F.M., a minor, by and through his Next Friend Bob Ekblad, D. G. F.M., a minor, by and through her Next Friend, Bob Ekblad and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, JUAN P. OSUNA, Director, Executive Office for Immigration Review, JEH JOHNSON, Secretary, Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FORMER FEDERAL IMMIGRATION JUDGES and others
Araceli Rodriguez v. Lonnie Swartz
as 15-16410
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ARACELI RODRIGUEZ, individually and as the surviving mother and personal representative of J.A.
Defendant - Appellant:
LONNIE SWARTZ, Agent of U.S. Border Patrol
Amicus Curiae:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PROFESSORS OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND FOREIGN RELATIONS LAW, HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH and others
Doe v. Lt. Gen. Franklin Lee Hagenbec
as 15-1890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
John Doe
Defendant:
1,2,3 and United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Lt. Gen. Franklin Lee Hagenbeck and Brig. Gen. William E. Rapp
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union, American Association of University Women, Human Rights and Gender Justice Clinic at the City University of New York School of Law and others
Movant:
University Administrators
Human Rights Watch v. Drug Enforcement Administration et al
as 2:2015cv02573
Defendant:
James Comey, Department of Homeland Security, Department of Justice and others
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Watch
First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles et al v. National Security Agency et al
as 3:2013cv03287
Plaintiff:
First Unitarian Church of Los Angeles , Bill of Rights Defense Committee , Calguns Foundation, Inc. and others
Defendant:
National Security Agency, Keith B. Alexander, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Viacom International, Inc. v. Youtube, Inc.
as 13-1720
Amicus Curiae:
Hank Green, Anaheim Ballet, Raymond T. Nimmer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Comedy Partners, Viacom Inc., Country Music Television, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
YouTube LLC and Google Inc.
Petitioner:
Football Association Premier League Limited, Cal IV Entertainment, LLC, Murbo Music Publishing, Inc. and others
Human Rights Watch v. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2013cv07360
Plaintiff:
Human Rights Watch
Defendant:
Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Ctr Natl Sec Studies, et al v. DOJ
as 02-5254
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Center for National Security Studies, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center and others
Not Yet Classified:
The Washington Post Company, American Society of Newspaper Editors, National Press Club and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States Department of Justice
Amicus Curiae:
Washington Legal Foundation and The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
