Cases 1 - 10 of 254
Hummer #042501 v. NaphCare Incorporated
as 2:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
John Hummer
Defendant:
NaphCare Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Hummer, et al.
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Devin M Lawson
Defendant:
Deputy Hummer, Kootenai County Sheriff's Office and Sgt. Norris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Smith v. David Dawdy, et al
as 23-2043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CARSON SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID DAWDY, Corrections Mental Health Program Director, official and personal capacity, HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, MDOC Director, official capacity, GREG JOHNSON, Corrections Mental Health Program Involuntary Treatment, personal capacity and others
Lester Hummer v. USA
as 23-5255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lester L. Hummer
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Hummer v. Revlon, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv13694
Plaintiff:
Irene Hummer
Defendant:
Revlon, Inc, Revlon Group Holdings, LLC. and Revlon Consumer Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith #233282 v. Dawdy et al
as 1:2023cv00575
Plaintiff:
Christopher Carson Smith #233282
Defendant:
David Dawdy, Heidi Washington, Greg Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUMMER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv09179
Plaintiff:
MATHEW HUMMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAGNER v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07508
Plaintiff:
JAMES WAGNER, JOHNATHAN WAGNER, BOYD A. WALKER, JR. and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUMMER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv07319
Plaintiff:
JARED HUMMER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
