Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Humphries v. Garland et al
as 6:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
David G. Humphries
Defendant:
Merrick Garland and Steven Dettelbach
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Humphries v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02217
Petitioner:
Earl Wayne Humphries
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sollberger v. Humphries
as 2:2023cv01023
Plaintiff:
Sarah Sollberger
Defendant:
Victoria Humphries
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Humphries v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Harmond P. Humphries
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Humphries v. Harris County
as 4:2022cv03721
Plaintiff:
Russell Humphries
Defendant:
Harris County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Humphry et al
as 5:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Michael Martinez
Defendant:
FNU Humphry, FNU Gonzalez, Officer FNU Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mainstream Real Estate Holding, Inc. et al v. BMI Investments et al
as 4:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
Mainstream Real Estate Holding, Inc., Georgetta Elaine Mattox and Ronal Lewis
Defendant:
BMI Investments, Barbara Markman, Melina Bible Cain and others
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
In the Matter of the Complaint of Weeks Marine, Inc. and Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc., as Owners and Operators of the Weeks 226, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liabilty
as 1:2022cv00045
Counter Defendant:
In the Matter of the Complaint of Weeks Marine, Inc. and Atlantic Sounding Co., Inc. as Owners and Operators of the Weeks 226, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Defendant:
Mark Humphries
Claimant:
Monroe Pittman and Belinda Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
