Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Wright v. Sevier County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Vickie Wright
Defendant:
Sevier County, Tennessee, Bart Tyner, Mark Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Hunter v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2024cv10989
Plaintiff:
Theron Hunter
Defendant:
Cunningham, Gaskill, Felver and others
Miller v. Hurtt et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Tonia Miller
Defendant:
Timothy Hurtt, Robert Peck, Russell Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Tracie Hunter v. Richard Dove, et al
as 24-3111
Plaintiff:
TRACIE HUNTER and TRACIE M. HUNTER
Defendant:
RICHARD A. DOVE, Individually and in his official capacity as Director for the Ohio Board of Professional Conduct of the State of Ohio and JOSEPH CALIGUIRI, Individually and in his official capacity as Disciplinary Counsel
Phelps v. Tekulve et al
as 1:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jimica D Phelps
Defendant:
Mark J Tekulve, Barbara Wiedenbein, Zach Garrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
William Griffin, Jr., et al v. Scott Hunter, et al
as 24-5004
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. GRIFFIN, JR. and P & G CONSTRUCTION CONSULTANTS LLC
Defendant:
SERGEANT SCOTT HUNTER, CHARLES TROTTER, LIEUTENANT SHAWN WILLIAMS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01344
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
