Cases 51 - 60 of 82
Jones v. Lehmkuhl et al
as 1:2011cv02384
Plaintiff:
Kevin Francis Jones
Defendant:
Marcus Lehmkuhl, City of Colorado Springs, Colorado, Colorado Springs Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00825
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rivera-Corraliza et al v. Puig et al
as 3:2011cv01219
Plaintiff:
Pablo Javier Rivera-Corraliza , Carlos Cruz-Alverio , Jaime Rodriguez-Vega and others
Defendant:
Juan Carlos Puig , Aileen De Leon, Victor Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pedro Rivera v. TX State Bd of Med Examiner
as 11-50030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEDRO IVAN RIVERA, also known as Pedro I. Rivera, also known as Pedro I Rivera
Defendant - Appellee:
TEXAS STATE BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
Rivera-Rodriguez et al v. Antares Oil Services, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv02214
Plaintiff:
Efrain Rivera-Rodriguez , Dinelia Suarez-Santos , Bernardo Febus-Coriano and others
Defendant:
Antares Oil Services, LLC, Repsol Petroleo, S.A., MAPFRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rosado et al v. Antares Oil Services, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv02105
Plaintiff:
Margarita Rosado , Jose Rivera-Rodriguez , Ana M. Rosario-Torres and others
Defendant:
Antares Oil Services, LLC, Repsol Petroleo, S.A., MAPFRE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rivera
as 2:2010mc00098
Plaintiff:
Santiago I Rivera
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and Dennis Cross
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Hatch et al v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02973
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc. and Deutsche Post World Net
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hatch, Ronald Haynes, Erik Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
