Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 49
iD Auto, LLC, et al v. IDParts LLC
as 24-1462
Plaintiff: ID AUTO, LLC and ID AUTO, INC.
Defendant: IDPARTS LLC
Interested Party: DLA PIPER LLP and MICHAEL A. GELLER
Gould et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 3:2024cv30033
Plaintiff: Rodney Elliot Gould and Jonathan Chad Brown
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Jonathan Kane, Maria C. Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 299,457.4 USDC, 162.5354 USDT, AND 6,941.648 TRX SEIZED FROM BINANCE ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID ENDING IN 3903 et al
as 1:2024cv10624
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 299,457.4 USDC, 162.5354 USDT, AND 6,941.648 TRX SEIZED FROM BINANCE ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID ENDING IN 3903, 1,455,143.462248 USDT, 3,032.1689461 SOL, 67.79400436 BNB, 95,336.8670150 TRX, 703.955431 ADA, AND 0.54151495 ETH SEIZED FROM BINANCE AASOCIATED WITH USER ID ENDING IN 7849 and 1,455,143.462248 USDT, 3,032.1689461 SOL, 67.79400436 BNB, 95,336.8670150 TRX, 13,703.955431 ADA, AND 0.54151495 ETH SEIZED FROM BINANCE AASOCIATED WITH USER ID ENDING IN 7849
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 193,169.0653 USDT SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID XXXX8768 ON JUNE 19, 2023 et al
as 1:2023cv12843
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 193,169.0653 USDT SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID XXXX8768 ON JUNE 19, 2023 and 11,146.8079 USDT AND 18.9649 BTC SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID XXXX1519 ON JUNE 19, 2023
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
White et al v. Pension Benefit Information, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv12512
Plaintiff: Diane White, Sabela Portillo and Rebecca Iddings
Defendant: Pension Benefit Information, LLC doing business as PBI Research Services and Progress Software Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
IN RE: MOVEit Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 1:2023md03083
Plaintiff: Shavonne Diggs, Brady Bradberry, Christina Bradberry and others
Defendant: Progress Software Corporation, Maximus Federal Services, Inc., The Berwyn Group, Inc. and others
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 303,992.547 USDT AND 100.896 BNB SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID xxxx4375 ON APRIL 13, 2023 et al
as 1:2023cv12193
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 303,992.547 USDT AND 100.896 BNB SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID xxxx4375 ON APRIL 13, 2023 and 108,551.008 USDT SEIZED FROM BINANCE ACCOUNT ASSOCIATED WITH USER ID xxxxx5891 ON APRIL 13, 2023
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. 18.836 BTC Seized From Binance Account Associated With User ID Ending In XXXX4627 On July 20, 2023
as 1:2023cv11952
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 18.836 BTC Seized From Binance Account Associated With User ID Ending In XXXX4627 On July 20, 2023
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 87,637.00 USDT seized from Binance associated with User ID ending in 1716
as 1:2023cv11911
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: 87,637.00 USDT seized from Binance associated with User ID ending in 1716
Cause Of Action: 19 U.S.C. § 1305 Custom Duties:0Forfeiture-Immoral Articles
L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, et al
as 23-1645
Plaintiff / Appellant: L. M., a minor by and through his father and stepmother and natural guardians, Christopher and Susan Morrison
Defendant / Appellee: MIDDLEBOROUGH, MA, MIDDLEBOROUGH SCHOOL COMMITTEE, CAROLYN J. LYONS, Superintendent, Middleborough Public Schools, in her official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: INSTITUTE FOR FAITH AND FAMILY, PARENTS DEFENDING EDUCATION, FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION and others
Petitioner: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF MASSACHUSETTS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?