Cases 1 - 10 of 462
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01726
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Naicom Corporation, et al v. Dish Network Corporation, et al
as 24-1416
Plaintiff:
NAICOM CORPORATION, D&V IP HOLDINGS, LLC, PAYLINK, LLC and others
Defendant:
DISH NETWORK CORPORATION, DISH NETWORK L.L.C., NAGRASTAR L.L.C. and others
WinView IP Holdings LLC v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 24-1651
Appellant:
WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
FANDUEL, INC.
WinView IP Holdings LLC v. DraftKings Inc.
as 24-1653
Appellant:
WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
DRAFTKINGS INC.
WinView IP Holdings LLC v. FanDuel, Inc.
as 24-1652
Appellant:
WINVIEW IP HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
FANDUEL, INC.
Tapestry Inc. et al v. The Gap Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02697
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach IP Holdings, LLC and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
The Gap, Inc. and Does 1-10, Inclusive,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Advanced Transactions, LLC v. Crunch, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Advanced Transactions, LLC
Defendant:
Crunch, LLC, Crunch Franchising, LLC, Crunch Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Versah LLC et al v. Star Dental Institute Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Versah LLC and Huwais IP Holding LLC
Defendant:
Star Dental Institute Inc. and Gary Moore
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Tapestry, Inc. et al v. Inland Empire Materials, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00176
Plaintiff:
Tapestry, Inc., Coach IP Holdings, LLC and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Inland Empire Materials, LLC and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
SB IP Holdings, LLC v. Vivint, Inc.
as 24-1366
Appellant:
SB IP HOLDINGS, LLC
Appellee:
VIVINT, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
