Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Carriker, et al v. City & County of Denver, et al
as 14-1485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CLAYBORN CARRIKER and DORIS CARRIKER
Defendant - Appellee:
THE CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLORADO and ISS FACILITY SERVICES, INC.
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
as 0:2014cv62091
Plaintiff:
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company , ISS Facility Services, Inc. and Anna Foster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Zuccaro et al v. ISS Facility Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01061
Plaintiff:
Linda F Zuccaro and Ronald Zuccaro
Defendant:
ISS Facility Services, Inc., The Ohio Turnpike and Infrastructure Commission and John Doe Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodriguez v. ISS Facility Services, Inc.
as 6:2014cv00119
Plaintiff:
Nora Rodriguez
Defendant:
ISS Facility Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Davis v. ISS Facility Services, Inc.
as 4:2013cv01112
Plaintiff:
Vicki L Davis
Defendant:
ISS Facility Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00795
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01729
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv01854
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
