Cases 1 - 10 of 11
LOPEZ v. BEARD
as 2:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
JEFFREY A. BEARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez et al v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2021cv01819
Plaintiff:
George Ivan Lopez, Darien Houser, Gerald Watkins and others
Defendant:
John E. Wetzel, Jeffrey A. Beard, Martin F. Horn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv04388
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
CITY OF LEHIGH COUNTY, JAMES B. MARTIN, JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE et al
as 2:2019cv00367
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BUREAU OF PROFESSIONAL COMPLIANCE OFFICE, JANE AND JOHN DOE and JOSEPH J. SILVA
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ZAMPETIS v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2015cv01231
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS J. ZAMPETIS
Defendant:
CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, IVAN LOPEZ, ANTHONY ALOSI, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LOPEZ v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv04851
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, ANTHONY MILLER, ROBERT GILMORE and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. VIDONISH et al
as 2:2012cv00957
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
PETER VIDONISH, CRAIG HAYWOOD, LOUIS FOLINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS JOHN WETZEL et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Petitioner:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF CORRECTIONS JOHN WETZEL and SUPERINTENDENT LOUIS S. FOLINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOPEZ v. GRAINEY et al
as 2:2008cv01342
Plaintiff:
GEORGE IVAN LOPEZ
Defendant:
DAVID GRAINEY, V. SANTOYO, PAUL PALYA and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MENDEZ v. DOE
as 2:2008cv04649
Plaintiff:
IVAN LOPEZ MENDEZ
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
