Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-16032
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Arizona, State of et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 2:2021cv00186
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Tracy Renaud and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Brnovich, Arizona, State of and Montana, State of
Amicus Curiae:
American Civil Liberties Union of Montana Foundation Incorporated, American Civil Liberties Union, Immigration Reform Law Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Pangea Legal Services, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17490
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, KENNETH T. CUCCINELLI, Deputy Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, JAMES MCHENRY, Director of the Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CATHOLIC LEGAL IMMIGRATION NETWORK, INC., DOLORES STREET COMMUNITY SERVICES, CAPITAL AREA IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS COALITION and others
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
NAM, et al v. USDHS, et al
as 20-17132
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, NATIONAL RETAIL FEDERATION, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MANUFACTURERS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL POMPEO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
U.S. TECH WORKERS, IMMIGRATION LAW PROFESSORS, LEADING COMPANIES AND BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS and others
Jenny Flores v. William Barr, et al
as 20-55951
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CHAD F. WOLF, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JENNY LISETTE FLORES
Amicus Curiae:
IMMIGRATION REFORM LAW INSTITUTE
Immigrant Legal Resource Center et al v. Wolf et al
as 4:2020cv05883
Plaintiff:
OneAmerica, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights and others
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Hawaii, State of New York, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Immigrant Legal Resources Cent, et al v. City of McFarland, et al
as 20-16580
Respondent:
CITY OF MCFARLAND PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF MCFARLAND
Not Classified By Court:
GEO GROUP, INC.
Petitioner:
IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCES CENTER and FREEDOM FOR IMMIGRANTS, Attorney General
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS, DR. PARVEEN PARMAR, AND DR. WILLIAM MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Immigrant Legal Resources Ctr., et al v. Geo Group, Inc., et al
as 20-16557
Respondent:
CITY OF MCFARLAND PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF MCFARLAND
Petitioner:
IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCES CENTER and FREEDOM FOR IMMIGRANTS, Attorney General
Appellant:
GEO GROUP, INC.
Intervenor:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae:
LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS, DR. PARVEEN PARMAR, AND DR. WILLIAM MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
City of San Jose, California et al v. Trump et al
as 5:2020cv05167
Plaintiff:
Black Alliance For Just Immigration, King County, Washington, Sam Liccardo and others
Defendant:
Cheryl L Johnson, Wilbur L. Ross, Donald J. Trump and others
Amicus Curiae:
Libby Garland, Ron Wyden, Steven Ruggles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 20-55436
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
