Cases 21 - 30 of 102
GEE-EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02354
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE GEE-EL Sui Juris, Propria Persona doing business as DOMINIQUE GEE
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, COMMISSIONER, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, CHAIRMAN, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD/COMMISSION/DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCGEE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2021cv01959
Plaintiff:
RANDY MCGEE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTION, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and ALBERTO COLLENTES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv00956
Defendant:
RIVER CITY POLYGRAPH, INDIANAPOLIS COUNSELING CENTER, LIBERTY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY J. HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLOCK v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2021cv00498
Plaintiff:
VINCENT KLOCK
Defendant:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD and CRAIG SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byron Hubbard v. Indiana Parole Board
as 20-3527
Respondent / Appellee:
KEITH BUTTS and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Petitioner / Appellant:
BYRON HUBBARD
PASSMORE et al v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2020cv00586
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., G.M. HORTH, ERIC J. HOLCOMB and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PASSMORE v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 2:2020cv00514
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Petitioner:
MICHAEL PASSMORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUARLES v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
as 2:2020cv00465
Petitioner:
DAMON QUARLES
Respondent:
INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TAIFA v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2020cv02198
Plaintiff:
KATAZA TAIFA
Defendant:
CURRENT PAROLE OFFICER, PAROLE OFFICE SUPERVISOR and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alan Kreilein v. Gwendolyn Horth, et al
as 20-2120
Defendant / Appellee:
GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, Chair, Indiana Parole Board and ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., Commissioner, Indiana Department of Corrections
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN KREILEIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
