Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00846
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4382
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rajkarnjikar v. Maplebear Inc.
as 3:2026cv01080
Plaintiff:
Nirjala Rajkarnjikar
Defendant:
Maplebear Inc. doing business as Instacart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Monroe v. Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart
as 3:2026cv05011
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Monroe
Defendant:
Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart
Counter-Claimant:
Phoenix Monroe
Counter-Defendant:
Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Shahvekilian v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 1:2026cv02275
Plaintiff:
Zarmine Shahvekilian
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation doing business as Costco Wholesale and Maplebear Inc. and John Doe 1 doing business as Instacart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart v. Amazon.Com, Inc.
as 3:2026mc80136
Petitioner:
Maplebear Inc. d/b/a Instacart
Respondent:
Amazon.Com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Whalen v. Maplebear Inc., et al
as 4:2026cv02833
Plaintiff:
Loretta Whalen
Defendant:
Miguel Petit and Maplebear Inc. doing business as Instacart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Wonzy v. Maplebear Inc. dba Instacart
as 4:2026cv02594
Plaintiff:
Martin J Wonzy
Defendant:
Maplebear Inc. doing business as Instacart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
McCray v. Maple Bear, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00335
Plaintiff:
Edmon T. McCray
Defendant:
Maple Bear, Inc. doing business as Instacart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
CHRISTOPHER v. MAPLEBAR INC.
as 1:2026cv00582
Plaintiff:
IHEBEREME CHRISTOPHER
Defendant:
MAPLEBAR INC. doing business as INSTACART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
