Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Rossabi et al v. Lloyd's America Inc et al
as 2:2023cv05157
Plaintiff: Amiel J Rossabi and Catherine C Rossabi
Defendant: Lloyd's America Inc, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, Minuteman Adjusters Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Contract Insurance
Campbell et al v. Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's of London We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2023cv01175
Plaintiff: Robin Campbell and Farzad Barkhordari
Defendant: Lloyd's America, Inc. and Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's of London Subscribing to Policy No. BWD640358R3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Michael Bailey v. Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London
as 23-1642
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL A. BAILEY and CHRISTIE B. BAILEY
Defendant / Appellee: CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. BWD652420
Type: Contract Insurance
Entrepraneur Dream Team v. Certain Interested Underwriters of Lloyd's Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv00529
Plaintiff: Entrepraneur Dream Team
Defendant: Certain Interested Underwriters of Lloyd's Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Bailey et al v. Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. BWD652420 We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv00159
Plaintiff: Michael A. Bailey and Christie B. Bailey
Defendant: Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London Subscribing to Policy No. BWD652420
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
South Hill Hotel, LLC, et al. v. CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, et al.
as 3:2021cv00620
Plaintiff: South Hill Hotel, LLC d/b/a Days Inn By Wyndham South Hill
Defendant: Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London known as Lloyd Syndicate #5000 with a Carrier/Syndicate Pseudonym TRV having an NAIC # AA-112-6003 Subscribing to Policy No. AVS0113191, CERTAIN INTERESTED UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S LONDON Subscribing to Policy No. AVS011319101 a/k/a CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD'S, INDIAN HARBOR INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
P&D Development Corporation v. Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No AUF2018-0218
as 4:2021cv01184
Defendant: Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London Subscribing to Policy No AUF2018-0218
Plaintiff: P&D Development Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. American Casualty Company of Reading, PA et al
as 1:2018cv02972
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London subscribing to facultative reinsurance Certificate DRA 0010177-01/2017100003409 and Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London
Defendant: American Casualty Company of Reading, PA, Continental Casualty Company and American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance
Jones v. Certain Interested Underwriters at Loyd's et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv02618
Defendant: Creech, Roddey & Watson, Certain Interested Underwriters at Loyd's, Tapco Underwriters, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Charlie L. Jones
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Type: Contract Insurance
Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Certificate Number OME11989 v. Chesapeake Building Supply, LLC
as 1:2017cv00327
Plaintiff: Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, Subscribing to Certificate Number OME11989
Defendant: Chesapeake Building Supply, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?